Affected vs. effected object - Revision history

Danielrr at 11:09, 21 January 2011

2011-01-21T11:09:11Z

Danielrr: Sp. translation

2011-01-21T11:08:37Z

Sp. translation

Haspelmath: /* Reference */

2008-04-09T16:54:23Z

Reference

Skrylov: /* Other languages */

2007-08-10T00:49:19Z

Other languages

Linguipedia: New page: A relatively old semantic-role distinction is that between '''affected objects''', i.e. patients which are affected by the verbal action, and '''effected objects''', i.e. particip...

2007-06-18T17:09:06Z

New page: A relatively old semantic-role distinction is that between '''affected objects''', i.e. patients which are affected by the verbal action, and '''effected objects''', i.e. particip...

New page

A relatively old semantic-role distinction is that between '''affected objects''', i.e. [[patient]]s which are [[affected]] by the verbal action, and '''effected objects''', i.e. participants which come into being as a result of the verbal action.

::*''“One example of a ‘covert’ grammatical distinction is the one to which traditional grammarians have attached the labels ‘''affectum''’ and ‘''effectum''’, in German ‘''affiziertes Objekt''’ and ‘''effiziertes Objekt''’. The distinction, which is reportedly made overt in some languages, can be seen in Sentences 1 and 2. 1. John ruined the table. 2. John built the table. Note that in one case the object is understood as existing antecedently to John's activities, while in the other case its existence resulted from John's activities."'' (Fillmore 1968:4)

===Examples===
*affected objects: ''open the door, paint the house, destroy a house''
*effected objects: ''paint a painting, build a house, draw a line''

===Synonyms===
*''affectum object'' vs. ''effectum object'' (Fillmore 1968:4)

===Reference===
*Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. ''The case for case.'' In: Bach, Emmon & Harms, R.T. (eds.) ''Universals in linguistic theory.'' New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1-88.

===Other languages===
German [[affiziertes vs. effiziertes Objekt]]

{{dc}}
[[Category:Semantic role]]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *German [[affiziertes vs. effiziertes Objekt]]
 *Russian [[аффицируемый vs. эффицируемый объект]]
-*Spanish [[objeto efecto vs. objeto afecto]]
+*Spanish [[objeto afecto vs. objeto efecto]]
 {{dc}}
 [[Category:Semantic role]]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *German [[affiziertes vs. effiziertes Objekt]]
 *Russian [[аффицируемый vs. эффицируемый объект]]
 {{dc}}
 [[Category:Semantic role]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ===Reference===
-*Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. ''The case for case.'' In: Bach, Emmon & Harms, R.T. (eds.) ''Universals in linguistic theory.'' New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1-88.
+*[[Fillmore, Charles J.|Charles J. Fillmore]] 1968. ''The case for case.'' In: Bach, Emmon & Harms, R.T. (eds.) ''Universals in linguistic theory.'' New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1-88.
 ===Other languages===