<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Checking_theory</id>
	<title>Checking theory - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Checking_theory"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Checking_theory&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T14:32:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Checking_theory&amp;diff=5924&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Luo: from Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Checking_theory&amp;diff=5924&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-04-23T13:31:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;from Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In generative syntax, '''checking theory''' is a notion in the [[Minimalist Program]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Example===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''[&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TP&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; John &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;vP&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; t&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;John&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; likes Mary]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the example, movement of ''John'' to spec,T deletes the uninterpretable phi-features of ''likes''; the phi-features of ''likes'' are checked by ''John''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comments===&lt;br /&gt;
Checking theory attempts to link two apparent 'imperfections' of human language: the existence of LF-uninterpretable features in lexical items, and [[movement]]. Movement of an element A with feature F to the [[checking domain]] of an element B with a matching ([[uninterpretable]]) feature F', deletes the uninterpretable feature F' in B. If F in A is uninterpretable, F is also deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Chomsky]] (1995) argues that under checking theory, the existence of movement can be understood as the way in which the computational system tries to satisfy the interface requirement of [[full interpretation]]: movement is needed to get rid of uninterpretable features. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chomsky (1998, 1999) takes a different view on the relation between feature checking and movement; there, movement is supposed to exist independently, for functional reasons, and [[feature checking]] is considered to be one of the mechanisms that can implement movement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Link===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Checking+theory&amp;amp;lemmacode=1559 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
*{{: Chomsky 1995}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{: Chomsky 1998}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{: Chomsky 1999}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Syntax]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Luo</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>