<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Control</id>
	<title>Control - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Control"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Control&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-21T22:36:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Control&amp;diff=6145&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Luo: from Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Control&amp;diff=6145&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-05-18T13:12:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;from Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In generative syntax, '''control''' is the phenomenon that the understood ([[PRO]]) subject of an infinitival clause must be anaphorically dependent on a specific argument of the matrix clause. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In phonology, '''control''' is a mechanism introduced in DiSciullo &amp;amp; Williams (1987) which assigns a special linkage between the argument of an affix and a position in the verb's argument structure, thereby preventing that argument from being realized syntactically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Examples===&lt;br /&gt;
In (i), the understood subject of ''to leave'' must be ''John''; in (ii), it is ''Susan''. The case in (i) is called 'subject control' (the so-called controller ''John'' is a subject), the case in (ii) 'object control' (''Susan'' is an indirect object). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(i)  ''John promised Susan to leave''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(ii) ''John persuaded Susan to leave''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[argument structure]] of the English [[verb]] ''employ'' consists of two arguments (viz. AGENT and THEME). If the [[suffix]] ''-er'' is added to this verb, the resulting [[noun]] ''employer'' is an AGENT, and in ''John's employer'', ''John'' cannot realize that argument. On the other hand, if the [[suffix]] ''-ee'' is added to this verb the resulting noun ''employee'' is a THEME, and in the [[NP]] ''John's employee'', the noun ''John'' cannot express the THEME role. DiSciullo &amp;amp; Williams account for the difference between ''-er'' and ''-ee'' by assuming that the [[suffix]] ''-er'' controls the external argument (= AGENT role) of the [[verb]] ''employ'', while ''-ee'' controls its internal argument (= THEME role). In both cases, the controlled argument cannot be expressed in syntax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===See also===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Control Theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Link===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Control&amp;amp;lemmacode=932 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
*{{: Chomsky 1981}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Di Sciullo, A. M. &amp;amp; Williams, E. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, Mass: MIT-press.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{: Spencer 1991}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Syntax]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Phonology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Luo</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>