Doculect - Revision history

Cysouw at 08:34, 10 April 2008

2008-04-10T08:34:30Z

Haspelmath at 06:01, 10 April 2008

2008-04-10T06:01:00Z

Haspelmath: New page: The term '''doculect''' is sometimes used for a variety of a language that has been described or otherwise documented in a coherent way. ===Examples=== For instance, two grammars of Egyp...

2008-04-10T05:59:40Z

New page: The term '''doculect''' is sometimes used for a variety of a language that has been described or otherwise documented in a coherent way. ===Examples=== For instance, two grammars of Egyp...

New page

The term '''doculect''' is sometimes used for a variety of a language that has been described or otherwise documented in a coherent way.

===Examples===
For instance, two grammars of Egyptian Arabic describe two different doculects, even if they are both about, say, educated middle-class colloquial Cairo Arabic. The mere fact that there are two different descriptions makes the varieties described in them different doculects. Another example would be two different corpora, e.g. a corpus of French based on ''Le Monde'' and one based on ''Agence France Press''. Even though one would perhaps not expect any differences in the structure of the language between the two corpora, the two varieties are by definition different doculects.

===Origin===
The term arose in discussions between [[Michael Cysouw]], [[Jeff Good]] and [[Martin Haspelmath]] in 2006 at the [[Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology]]. It is based on the term [[lect]] and the word ''documentation''.

:::''"Jeff Good (pers. comm.) has introduced the term ‘doculect’ to refer to the variety of the ‘language’ that ends up in the documentation."'' (Bowern 2008:8)

===References===
Bowern, Claire. 2008. ''Linguistic fieldwork.'' New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

===Other languages===
German [[Dokulekt]]

{{dc}}
[[Category:General]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The term '''doculect''' is sometimes used for a variety of a language that has been described or otherwise documented in a coherent way.
+The term '''doculect''' is sometimes used for a variety of a language that has been described or otherwise documented in a coherent way. The term was originally designed to refer to the lowest level [[languoid]] that linguistics can meaningfully refer to. In a more extreme view, even the pure mentioning of a speech variety in any source (possibly without any information about the language itself) can be seen as a doculect. In this view, a reference to a language in a classical source, in a traveler's diary, or in a census are also doculects. The use of the term '''doculect''' is meant to remind linguists of the fact that
 ===Examples===
-For instance, two grammars of Egyptian Arabic describe two different doculects, even if they are both about, say, educated middle-class colloquial Cairo Arabic. The mere fact that there are two different descriptions makes the varieties described in them different doculects. Another example would be two different corpora, e.g. a corpus of French based on ''Le Monde'' and one based on ''Agence France Press''. Even though one would perhaps not expect any differences in the structure of the language between the two corpora, the two varieties are by definition different doculects.
+For instance, two grammars of Egyptian Arabic describe two different doculects, even if they are both about, say, educated middle-class colloquial Cairo Arabic. The mere fact that there are two different descriptions makes the varieties described in them different doculects. Another example would be two different corpora, e.g. a corpus of French based on ''Le Monde'' and one based on ''Agence France Press''. Even though one would perhaps not expect any differences in the structure of the language between the two corpora, the two varieties are by definition different doculects. Also, when examples are given in a publication, based on personal knowledge of the author, or on personal communication between the author and a native speaker, these examples themselves form an (idiolectal) doculect.
 ===Origin===

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ===References===
-Bowern, Claire. 2008. ''Linguistic fieldwork.'' New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
+[[Bowern, Claire]]. 2008. ''Linguistic fieldwork.'' New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
 ===Other languages===