Feature cooccurrence restrictions - Revision history

NBlöcher: Marked as {{ref}}

2014-06-29T16:17:25Z

Marked as {{ref}}

2009-03-05T09:12:14Z

extended the phonological part

2009-03-05T08:52:36Z

Example: pluralized section title

2009-03-05T08:52:07Z

added phonological use of FCRs

2007-09-21T10:36:28Z

2007-09-21T10:25:51Z

Comments

2007-09-21T10:22:09Z

2007-09-21T10:20:19Z

2007-09-21T10:12:19Z

Other Languages

2007-09-21T09:04:00Z

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ===Other Languages===
 * German [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions (de)]]
-{{dc}}
+{{dc}}{{ref}}
 [[Category:Syntax]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]] (GPSG) uses '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) to formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures. As GPSG takes feature structures to be arbitrary sets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.
-Many theories of phonological features also apply FCRs.
+Many theories of phonological features also apply FCRs: pairs of features, or pairs of features together with their values, that cannot cooccur within a segment.
 ===Examples===

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Many theories of phonological features also apply FCRs.
-===Example===
+===Examples===
 Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]] (GPSG) uses '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) to formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures. As GPSG takes feature structures to be arbitrary sets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.
 ===Example===
 Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]
-Phrasal catgories can not contain the feature ''subcat'': [BAR 2] <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>\neg</math> [SUBCAT]
+Phrasal catgories cannot contain the feature ''subcat'': [BAR 2] <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>\neg</math> [SUBCAT]
 ===Comments===

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 21 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures ~~used by [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]~~. As a feature ~~structure in this approach is taken~~ to be an arbitrary ~~set~~ of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.	+	[[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]] (GPSG) uses '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) to formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures. As GPSG takes feature structures to be arbitrary sets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.

	===Example===		===Example===

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ===Comments===
-Modern unification grammar formalisms like [[Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar]] use typed feature strcutures instead.
+Modern unification-based grammar formalisms like [[Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar]] use [[typed feature structures]] instead.
 ===Other Languages===

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, 21 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures used by [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]. As a feature structure in this approach is taken to be an arbitrary set of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.		'''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures used by [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]. As a feature structure in this approach is taken to be an arbitrary set of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.

		+	===Example===
		+	Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'':
		+
		+	[VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]
		+
		+
		+	Phrasal catgories can not contain the feature ''subcat''
		+
		+	[BAR 2] <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>\neg</math> [SUBCAT]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 21 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures used by [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]. As a feature structure in this approach is taken to be an arbitrary set of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.		'''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures used by [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]. As a feature structure in this approach is taken to be an arbitrary set of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.
		+
		+
		+
		+	===Other Languages===
		+	* German Feature cooccurrence restrictions (ger
		+	{{dc}}
		+	[[Category:Syntax]]