Glottopedia:Problems - Revision history

NBlöcher: Added a new item

2014-08-17T07:28:18Z

Added a new item

NBlöcher at 15:22, 27 July 2014

2014-07-27T15:22:13Z

NBlöcher: Since I can take care of articles which exist twice now I removed the respective section

2014-07-24T17:15:45Z

Since I can take care of articles which exist twice now I removed the respective section

NBlöcher: /* Doppelganger articles */

2014-07-18T16:11:09Z

Doppelganger articles

NBlöcher: /* Doppelganger articles */

2014-07-18T16:03:13Z

Doppelganger articles

NBlöcher at 12:26, 13 July 2014

2014-07-13T12:26:11Z

NBlöcher: /* Doppelganger articles */

2014-07-12T07:08:04Z

Doppelganger articles

NBlöcher: /* Doppelganger articles */

2014-07-12T07:07:03Z

Doppelganger articles

NBlöcher: /* Doppelganger articles */

2014-07-04T19:58:26Z

Doppelganger articles

NBlöcher: /* Doppelganger articles */

2014-06-29T16:25:49Z

Doppelganger articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 17 August 2014
Line 76:		Line 76:
	===Phonetics and Phonology vs. Phonetics and phonology===		===Phonetics and Phonology vs. Phonetics and phonology===
	- The major categories [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Category:Phonetics_and_Phonology Phonetics and Phonology] and [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Category:Phonetics_and_phonology Phonetics and phonology] both exists. I would move the articles from one category to the other and then delete one of the categories if that's alright. --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]		- The major categories [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Category:Phonetics_and_Phonology Phonetics and Phonology] and [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Category:Phonetics_and_phonology Phonetics and phonology] both exists. I would move the articles from one category to the other and then delete one of the categories if that's alright. --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]
		+
		+	===Placeholder content===
		+	- The article on [[Reflexiv]] states that the actual article will follow soon, but since it was created several years ago I somewhat doubt that the author will add the promised content. Shall we leave the content as it is? Maybe it will keep others from editing the article. --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 27 July 2014
Line 73:		Line 73:
	===Missing Policy?===		===Missing Policy?===
	- I was about to delete an article when I noticed that there is a broken link concernig the reference to the policy (The line goes: "You are about to delete a page along with all of its history. Please confirm that you intend to do this, that you understand the consequences, and that you are doing this in accordance with the [[Glottopedia:Policy]]"). I tried to find the related page but only came across the policies mentioned at [[Glottopedia:Community Portal]]. Even though this does not affect most of Glottopedia's users it would be helpful if the link could be fixed (or does the page still need to be created?) --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]		- I was about to delete an article when I noticed that there is a broken link concernig the reference to the policy (The line goes: "You are about to delete a page along with all of its history. Please confirm that you intend to do this, that you understand the consequences, and that you are doing this in accordance with the [[Glottopedia:Policy]]"). I tried to find the related page but only came across the policies mentioned at [[Glottopedia:Community Portal]]. Even though this does not affect most of Glottopedia's users it would be helpful if the link could be fixed (or does the page still need to be created?) --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]
		+
		+	===Phonetics and Phonology vs. Phonetics and phonology===
		+	- The major categories [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Category:Phonetics_and_Phonology Phonetics and Phonology] and [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Category:Phonetics_and_phonology Phonetics and phonology] both exists. I would move the articles from one category to the other and then delete one of the categories if that's alright. --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 24 July 2014
Line 67:		Line 67:

	: I changed the category to "En" in [[Behaghel's Law]]. The reason why it didn't was that is was still categorised as <nowiki>{{wb}}</nowiki> which attributes DICT and De. Adding a separate En doesn't overwrite that. To change the category to "En", simply exchange <nowiki>{{wb}}</nowiki> with <nowiki>{{dc}}</nowiki>. --[[User:KPolitt\|KPolitt]] ([[User talk:KPolitt\|talk]]) 09:34, 29 June 2014 (CEST)		: I changed the category to "En" in [[Behaghel's Law]]. The reason why it didn't was that is was still categorised as <nowiki>{{wb}}</nowiki> which attributes DICT and De. Adding a separate En doesn't overwrite that. To change the category to "En", simply exchange <nowiki>{{wb}}</nowiki> with <nowiki>{{dc}}</nowiki>. --[[User:KPolitt\|KPolitt]] ([[User talk:KPolitt\|talk]]) 09:34, 29 June 2014 (CEST)
−
−	~~===Doppelganger articles===~~
−	~~Articles/Topics that seem to exists twice:~~
−	*[[Bernouilli principle]] vs. [[Bernoulli principle]] <br>
−	*[[Binding condition]] vs. [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Binding_Condition&redirect=no Binding Condition Redirect] vs. [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Binding_Condition Binding Condition Version 2] <br>
−	*[[blend]] vs. [[blending]] <br>
−	*[[bound form]] vs. [[bound morpheme]] <br>
−	*[[dvanda compound]] vs. [[dvandva]] <br>
−
−	~~--[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]~~

	===Problems with reference formatting===		===Problems with reference formatting===

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 *[[bound form]] vs. [[bound morpheme]] <br>
 *[[dvanda compound]] vs. [[dvandva]] <br>
 --[[User:NBlöcher|NBlöcher]]

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 *[[dvanda compound]] vs. [[dvandva]] <br>
 *[[Finite and nonfinite]] vs. [[Finite vs. nonfinite]] <br>
 --[[User:NBlöcher|NBlöcher]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 13 July 2014
Line 83:		Line 83:
	===Problems with reference formatting===		===Problems with reference formatting===
	- This might be more of an aesthetic problem than anything else, but sometimes I come across articles whose references are strangely formatted. An example can be found here: [[Conceptual Structure]]. Can anything be done about the space between the last two references? As far as I know this only happens with those references that are frequently used and thus have their own reference shortcut. --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]		- This might be more of an aesthetic problem than anything else, but sometimes I come across articles whose references are strangely formatted. An example can be found here: [[Conceptual Structure]]. Can anything be done about the space between the last two references? As far as I know this only happens with those references that are frequently used and thus have their own reference shortcut. --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]
		+
		+	===Missing Policy?===
		+	- I was about to delete an article when I noticed that there is a broken link concernig the reference to the policy (The line goes: "You are about to delete a page along with all of its history. Please confirm that you intend to do this, that you understand the consequences, and that you are doing this in accordance with the [[Glottopedia:Policy]]"). I tried to find the related page but only came across the policies mentioned at [[Glottopedia:Community Portal]]. Even though this does not affect most of Glottopedia's users it would be helpful if the link could be fixed (or does the page still need to be created?) --[[User:NBlöcher\|NBlöcher]]

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 ===Doppelganger articles===
-- Looks like we have a doppelganger: [[Bernouilli principle]] vs. [[Bernoulli principle]] <br>
+Articles/Topics that seem to exists twice:
-And: <br> [[Binding condition]] vs. [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Binding_Condition&redirect=no Binding Condition Redirect] vs. [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Binding_Condition Binding Condition Version 2] <br>
+*[[Bernouilli principle]] vs. [[Bernoulli principle]] <br>
-[[blend]] vs. [[blending]] <br>
+*[[Binding condition]] vs. [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Binding_Condition&redirect=no Binding Condition Redirect] vs. [http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Binding_Condition Binding Condition Version 2] <br>
-[[bound form]] vs. [[bound morpheme]] <br>
+*[[blend]] vs. [[blending]] <br>
-[[dvanda compound]] vs. [[dvandva]] <br>
+*[[bound form]] vs. [[bound morpheme]] <br>
-[[Finite and nonfinite]] vs. [[Finite vs. nonfinite]] <br>
+*[[dvanda compound]] vs. [[dvandva]] <br>
-[[Incompatibility]] vs. [[Incompatible]]<br>
+*[[Finite and nonfinite]] vs. [[Finite vs. nonfinite]] <br>
 Also we have an article on [[Journal of Quantitative Linguistics]] and this one on [[Journals of Quantitative Linguistics]], which has already been marked as a candidate for deletion. I categorised the latter as "deletion candidate" for now.