<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Productivity</id>
	<title>Productivity - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Productivity"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Productivity&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T17:54:15Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Productivity&amp;diff=8571&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Wohlgemuth: utrecht</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Productivity&amp;diff=8571&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2009-02-20T12:54:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;utrecht&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Productivity''' is a term which mainly applies to [[word formation]] processes. If a process is fully regular and actively used in the creation of new words, one regards this process as being productive. Productive word formation is opposed to unproductive word formation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Examples===&lt;br /&gt;
The English suffix -''ness'' can be attached to any adjective even if there is a more conventionally acceptable alternative (''sterileness'' next to ''sterility''). We say that -''ness'' is a productive suffix. We can contrast this with the suffix -''th'' which performs the same role, but only for a handful of words (sometimes accompanied by other idiosyncratic changes): ''warmth, strength, health''. The suffix -''th'' is unproductive. Linguists differ in the way productivity is treated. Many linguists (e.g. Aronoff 1976) take the position that linguistic theory must account for differences in productivity, while others (e.g. DiSciullo &amp;amp;amp; Williams 1987) assume that productivity is a matter of performance, and must be explained elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Links ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Productivity&amp;amp;lemmacode=442 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.&lt;br /&gt;
* Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. ''On the Definition of Word,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.&lt;br /&gt;
* Schultink, H. 1962. ''De morfologische valentie van het ongelede adjectief,'' proefschrift Leiden; ongewijzigde herdruk uitgegeven door HES Publishers, Utrecht 1980.&lt;br /&gt;
* Schultink, H. 1961. ''Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen,'' Forum der Letteren 2, pp. 110-125&lt;br /&gt;
* Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory,'' Blackwell, Oxford.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Morphology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wohlgemuth</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>