Talk:Stratum (in neurocognitive linguistics) - Revision history

PaulSank: /* change made */

2008-06-28T19:18:08Z

change made

PaulSank: change made

2008-06-28T19:17:22Z

change made

PaulSank: Talk:Stratum (in Sydney Lamb's approach) moved to Talk:Stratum (in neurocognitive linguistics): To use the formal name of the theory.

2008-06-28T18:44:42Z

Talk:Stratum (in Sydney Lamb's approach) moved to Talk:Stratum (in neurocognitive linguistics): To use the formal name of the theory.

Haspelmath: Talk:Stratum moved to Talk:Stratum (in Sydney Lamb's approach)

2008-06-23T19:06:27Z

Talk:Stratum moved to Talk:Stratum (in Sydney Lamb's approach)

PaulSank: adding a reply

2008-06-23T06:33:10Z

adding a reply

PaulSank: /* re: your comments */

2008-06-23T06:29:00Z

re: your comments

PaulSank: re: your comments

2008-06-23T06:28:20Z

re: your comments

Kevin Russell at 08:15, 19 June 2008

2008-06-19T08:15:10Z

Haspelmath: New page: In the text, the expression "the theory" occurs once. Which theory is meant?--~~~~

2008-06-16T09:29:32Z

New page: In the text, the expression "the theory" occurs once. Which theory is meant?--~~~~

New page

In the text, the expression "the theory" occurs once. Which theory is meant?--[[User:Haspelmath|Haspelmath]] 11:29, 16 June 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 28 June 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I'm grateful that I had the chance to address the disambiguation issue while the list of my entries is still small!		I'm grateful that I had the chance to address the disambiguation issue while the list of my entries is still small!
		+
		+	--[[User:PaulSank\|PaulSank]] 21:18, 28 June 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 28 June 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Thank you for your comments. Next time I get to work on this stuff, I see no problem with making adjustments that reflect what you've said. --[[User:PaulSank\|PaulSank]] 08:33, 23 June 2008 (CEST)		Thank you for your comments. Next time I get to work on this stuff, I see no problem with making adjustments that reflect what you've said. --[[User:PaulSank\|PaulSank]] 08:33, 23 June 2008 (CEST)
		+
		+	== change made ==
		+
		+	Getting back to work here in Glottopedia, I noticed a disambiguation page re: [[stratum]]. I'm glad I saw it, because it gave me, a Wiki newbie, some clues about how to effect the change noted above in this discussion.
		+
		+	The page referred to "Stratum (in Sydney Lamb's approach"), so the first thing I did was replace the possessive NP with the formal name of the theory ([[neurocognitive linguistics]]).
		+
		+	Then I proceeded to change all the related internal links from "stratum" to "[[stratum (in neurocognitive linguistics)]]". And let me tell you I'm so glad I had gotten myself organized before I started composing entries! I had made an index which lists all the entries and the cross-references pointing out of each, and I added symbols for whether an entry had actually been posted, or whether I was working on one, or whether it didn't yet exist at all. This index made it easier for me to perform the task of changing all those links, a job which was also made easier by the fact that I haven't posted a large number of entries yet.
		+
		+	I'm grateful that I had the chance to address the disambiguation issue while the list of my entries is still small!

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:33, 23 June 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== re: your comments ==		== re: your comments ==

−	Thank you for your comments. Next time I get to work on this stuff, I see no problem with making adjustments that reflect what you've said. --~~Paul Sank~~	+	Thank you for your comments. Next time I get to work on this stuff, I see no problem with making adjustments that reflect what you've said. --[[User:PaulSank\|PaulSank]] 08:33, 23 June 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 23 June 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== re: your comments ==		== re: your comments ==

−	Thank you for your comments. Next time I get to work on this stuff, I see no problem with making adjustments that reflect what you've said.	+	Thank you for your comments. Next time I get to work on this stuff, I see no problem with making adjustments that reflect what you've said. --Paul Sank

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:28, 23 June 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I would guess it means Lamb's stratificational grammar.		:I would guess it means Lamb's stratificational grammar.
	:Could this page be moved to "Stratum (in subfield X)"? There should eventually also be entries for "stratum" as it's used in lexical phonology and in creole linguistics and probably more. I just can't think what "X" should be in this case. [[User:Kevin Russell\|Kevin Russell]] 10:15, 19 June 2008 (CEST)		:Could this page be moved to "Stratum (in subfield X)"? There should eventually also be entries for "stratum" as it's used in lexical phonology and in creole linguistics and probably more. I just can't think what "X" should be in this case. [[User:Kevin Russell\|Kevin Russell]] 10:15, 19 June 2008 (CEST)
		+
		+	== re: your comments ==
		+
		+	Thank you for your comments. Next time I get to work on this stuff, I see no problem with making adjustments that reflect what you've said.

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:44, 28 June 2008
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:06, 23 June 2008
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 19 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In the text, the expression "the theory" occurs once. Which theory is meant?--[[User:Haspelmath\|Haspelmath]] 11:29, 16 June 2008 (CEST)		In the text, the expression "the theory" occurs once. Which theory is meant?--[[User:Haspelmath\|Haspelmath]] 11:29, 16 June 2008 (CEST)
		+	:I would guess it means Lamb's stratificational grammar.
		+	:Could this page be moved to "Stratum (in subfield X)"? There should eventually also be entries for "stratum" as it's used in lexical phonology and in creole linguistics and probably more. I just can't think what "X" should be in this case. [[User:Kevin Russell\|Kevin Russell]] 10:15, 19 June 2008 (CEST)