Difference between revisions of "Descriptive adequacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) (+cat) |
(Marked as {{ref}}) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The assessment of a theory's descriptive adequacy obviously is closely related to what counts as 'good' natural language data, and hence to the concepts of [[grammaticality]] and [[well-formedness]]. | The assessment of a theory's descriptive adequacy obviously is closely related to what counts as 'good' natural language data, and hence to the concepts of [[grammaticality]] and [[well-formedness]]. | ||
| − | {{dc}} | + | {{dc}}{{ref}} |
[[Category:General]] | [[Category:General]] | ||
[[Category:Language description]] | [[Category:Language description]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:06, 28 June 2014
Descriptive adequacy is a quality measure for the evaluation of linguistic theories. A theory attains a higher level of descriptive adequacy if it can handle more natural language data from more languages.
The assessment of a theory's descriptive adequacy obviously is closely related to what counts as 'good' natural language data, and hence to the concepts of grammaticality and well-formedness.
| REF | This article has no reference(s) or source(s). Please remove this block only when the problem is solved. |
