Difference between revisions of "Tough-movement"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (utrecht) |
(Edited the format) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Definition== | ||
'''Tough-movement''' is the kind of [[movement]] that has been assumed in the [[derivation]] of [[sentence]]s such as (i), which are headed by [[predicate]]s like ''tough'' and ''easy''. | '''Tough-movement''' is the kind of [[movement]] that has been assumed in the [[derivation]] of [[sentence]]s such as (i), which are headed by [[predicate]]s like ''tough'' and ''easy''. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
The object of ''to please'', then, is a variable bound by the [[empty operator]] O which is coindexed with ''John''. Easy to confuse with [[though-movement]] though it is, it is different. | The object of ''to please'', then, is a variable bound by the [[empty operator]] O which is coindexed with ''John''. Easy to confuse with [[though-movement]] though it is, it is different. | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
| − | + | *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Tough-movement&lemmacode=182 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | |
| − | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Tough-movement&lemmacode=182 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == References == | ||
* Berman, A. 1974. ''Adjectives and Adjective Complement Constructions,'' diss. Harvard University. | * Berman, A. 1974. ''Adjectives and Adjective Complement Constructions,'' diss. Harvard University. | ||
* Brody, M. 1993. ''Theta-theory and arguments,'' Linguistic Inquiry 24, 1-23 | * Brody, M. 1993. ''Theta-theory and arguments,'' Linguistic Inquiry 24, 1-23 | ||
Latest revision as of 19:17, 29 August 2014
Definition
Tough-movement is the kind of movement that has been assumed in the derivation of sentences such as (i), which are headed by predicates like tough and easy.
(i) John is easy to please
If the adjective easy assigns no external theta-role, one is led (by the theta-criterion) to assume that the subject John has been moved out of the object position ei of please:
(ii) *Johni is easy [CP PRO to please ei ]
However, such an analysis is excluded, either as a case of improper movement, or as a binding violation. As a solution it has been proposed that John in (i) is an argument of the adjective easy, and that the CP is a modifying adjunct:
(iii) Johni is easy [CP Oi [PRO to please ei ]]
The object of to please, then, is a variable bound by the empty operator O which is coindexed with John. Easy to confuse with though-movement though it is, it is different.
Links
References
- Berman, A. 1974. Adjectives and Adjective Complement Constructions, diss. Harvard University.
- Brody, M. 1993. Theta-theory and arguments, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 1-23
- Chomsky, N. 1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory, MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 1-67. Reprinted in: Chomsky (1995).
- Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
- Pesetsky, D. 1987. Binding Problems with Experiencer Verbs, Linguisitc Inquiry 18-1, 126-140
- Postal, P. 1971. Cross-over phenomena, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
| STUB |
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
| FORMAT |
