Difference between revisions of "Restructuring"
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (utrecht) |
(Edited the format, removed the block {{cats}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{stub | + | {{stub}} |
| − | + | ==Definition== | |
'''Restructuring''' is a process which unites two clauses yielding one [[clause]]. | '''Restructuring''' is a process which unites two clauses yielding one [[clause]]. | ||
| − | + | == Example == | |
| − | |||
The following examples are from Italian. (ii) is the result of Restructuring: | The following examples are from Italian. (ii) is the result of Restructuring: | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
The Barriers framework, with some extensions, allows an analysis in which [[L-marking]] basically cancels the barrierhood of the complement clause, which otherwise would block clitic climbing. Clitic climbing then reduces to repeated application of [[head movement]]. An intervening complementizer - ''a'' in (iii) - remains a potential problem. | The Barriers framework, with some extensions, allows an analysis in which [[L-marking]] basically cancels the barrierhood of the complement clause, which otherwise would block clitic climbing. Clitic climbing then reduces to repeated application of [[head movement]]. An intervening complementizer - ''a'' in (iii) - remains a potential problem. | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
| − | + | *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Restructuring&lemmacode=341 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | |
| − | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Restructuring&lemmacode=341 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == References == | ||
* Burzio, L. 1986. ''Italian Syntax,'' Reidel, Dordrecht. | * Burzio, L. 1986. ''Italian Syntax,'' Reidel, Dordrecht. | ||
* Kayne, R. 1989. ''Null subjects and clitic climbing,'' in: O. Jaeggli and K. Safur (eds.) The null subject parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam | * Kayne, R. 1989. ''Null subjects and clitic climbing,'' in: O. Jaeggli and K. Safur (eds.) The null subject parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam | ||
| Line 31: | Line 28: | ||
* Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1982. ''On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax,'' Diss, MIT. | * Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1982. ''On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax,'' Diss, MIT. | ||
| − | + | == Morphology == | |
| − | |||
See [[Reanalysis]]. | See [[Reanalysis]]. | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
| − | + | *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Restructuring&lemmacode=341 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | |
| − | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Restructuring&lemmacode=341 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:14, 28 September 2014
| STUB |
Definition
Restructuring is a process which unites two clauses yielding one clause.
Example
The following examples are from Italian. (ii) is the result of Restructuring:
(i) [Si vuole [PRO vendere queste case a caro prezzo]]
one wants sell these houses at a high price
(ii) Queste casei si vogliono vendere ei a caro prezzo
In (i) it would be impossible to move the object queste case from the embedded clause into the matrix subject position, but, after Restructuring, this is exactly what happens in (ii). In general, Restructuring is assumed in order to explain clause union phenomena in Romance languages, such as Clitic Climbing and long movement as illustrated in (ii). No satisfactory formalization of Restructuring as a rule is available. A verb raising type of analysis, which would create a verb cluster, must be rejected, because non-verbal material, such as adverbs and complementizers, can intervene between the two verbs:
(iii) Loi verró subito a vedere ei
(I) it-will come at-once to see
I will come at once to see it
The Barriers framework, with some extensions, allows an analysis in which L-marking basically cancels the barrierhood of the complement clause, which otherwise would block clitic climbing. Clitic climbing then reduces to repeated application of head movement. An intervening complementizer - a in (iii) - remains a potential problem.
Links
References
- Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht.
- Kayne, R. 1989. Null subjects and clitic climbing, in: O. Jaeggli and K. Safur (eds.) The null subject parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
- Manzini, R. 1983a. Restructuring and reanalysis, diss. MIT.
- Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax, Foris, Dordrecht
- Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1982. On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax, Diss, MIT.
Morphology
See Reanalysis.
