Difference between revisions of "User talk:Paulinearl/Draft"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Hello Pauline! Thankyou for the interesting article, I think its good if you can make the definition section to one part, there is no need for two parts so as not to be confused to read.
 
Hello Pauline! Thankyou for the interesting article, I think its good if you can make the definition section to one part, there is no need for two parts so as not to be confused to read.
  
Hello Saphira! Thankyou for your advice. But I only made the definition in one part. below the definition is a different discussion. Thankyou!
+
Hello Saphira! Thankyou for your advice. But I only made the definition in one part, below the definition is a different discussion. Thankyou!

Revision as of 12:17, 3 June 2024

Hello Pauline! Thankyou for the interesting article, I think its good if you can make the definition section to one part, there is no need for two parts so as not to be confused to read.

Hello Saphira! Thankyou for your advice. But I only made the definition in one part, below the definition is a different discussion. Thankyou!