Difference between revisions of "User talk:Paulinearl/Draft"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Hello Pauline thanks for the interesting article, I think it's good that the definition section is just made into one part, there is no need for two parts so as not to be conf...") |
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (→Feedback) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Hello Pauline | + | |
| + | Hello Pauline! Thankyou for the interesting article, I think its good if you can make the definition section to one part, there is no need for two parts so as not to be confused to read. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello Saphira! Thankyou for your advice. But I only made the definition in one part, below the definition is a different discussion. Thankyou! | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Feedback == | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The main problem of your draft are these: | ||
| + | # formatting; please follow the rules already outlined. Example: Your bullet lists all start with the placeholder text "Bulleted list item", that is nonsensical. | ||
| + | # You do not cite in-text where you quoted / took which information from. Furthermore, you are using a reference from computer technology in your references. This is linguistics. | ||
| + | # The draft is still very superficial. It does not really explain things or link to explanations. You chose a very difficult topic. | ||
| + | --[[User:Wohlgemuth|wohlgemuth]] ([[User talk:Wohlgemuth|talk]]) 02:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Please check point 2 of above list. You still do not say where you got which information from. --[[User:Wohlgemuth|wohlgemuth]] ([[User talk:Wohlgemuth|talk]]) 04:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:52, 17 June 2024
Hello Pauline! Thankyou for the interesting article, I think its good if you can make the definition section to one part, there is no need for two parts so as not to be confused to read.
Hello Saphira! Thankyou for your advice. But I only made the definition in one part, below the definition is a different discussion. Thankyou!
Feedback
The main problem of your draft are these:
- formatting; please follow the rules already outlined. Example: Your bullet lists all start with the placeholder text "Bulleted list item", that is nonsensical.
- You do not cite in-text where you quoted / took which information from. Furthermore, you are using a reference from computer technology in your references. This is linguistics.
- The draft is still very superficial. It does not really explain things or link to explanations. You chose a very difficult topic.
--wohlgemuth (talk) 02:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please check point 2 of above list. You still do not say where you got which information from. --wohlgemuth (talk) 04:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
