Difference between revisions of "Core argument (in RRG)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Linguipedia (talk | contribs) (New page: In more recent versions of Role and Reference Grammar, a '''core argument''' is simply an argument of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's valency. *"Co...) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
In more recent versions of [[Role and Reference Grammar]], a '''core argument''' is simply an [[argument]] of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's [[valency]]. | In more recent versions of [[Role and Reference Grammar]], a '''core argument''' is simply an [[argument]] of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's [[valency]]. | ||
− | *"Core arguments are those arguments which are part of the semantic representation of the verb." (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997:26) | + | :::*''"Core arguments are those arguments which are part of the semantic representation of the verb."'' (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997:26) |
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Syntax]] |
+ | [[Category:RRG]] |
Latest revision as of 07:13, 12 September 2007
In more recent versions of Role and Reference Grammar, a core argument is simply an argument of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's valency.
- "Core arguments are those arguments which are part of the semantic representation of the verb." (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997:26)
Comments
In earlier versions of Role and Reference Grammar, there was also a notion of peripheral argument (Foley & Van Valin 1984). In the more recent versions, there is no apparently no distinction between core argument and argument.
Synonym
Subtypes
Reference
- Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.