Difference between revisions of "Feature cooccurrence restrictions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures used by [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]. As a feature structure in this approach is taken to be an arbitrary set of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications. | '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures used by [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]. As a feature structure in this approach is taken to be an arbitrary set of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications. | ||
+ | ===Example=== | ||
+ | Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': | ||
+ | |||
+ | [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Phrasal catgories can not contain the feature ''subcat'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | [BAR 2] <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>\neg</math> [SUBCAT] | ||
Revision as of 10:20, 21 September 2007
Feature cooccurrence restrictions (FCRs) formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures used by Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. As a feature structure in this approach is taken to be an arbitrary set of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.
Example
Only verbal catgories can contain the feature vform:
[VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]
Phrasal catgories can not contain the feature subcat
[BAR 2] <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>\neg</math> [SUBCAT]