Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Linguistik"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(What for? General issues with categorization.) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I thought Glottopedia would contain articles somehow related to Linguistics. Basically every article would have to be in this category. I feel we still don't have a consens on the category levels in Glottopedia. There is this guideline ([[Glottopedia:Categorization]]), but there are [[:Category:Categories|These top-level categories]]. There is a lot to discuss. --[[User:Sven Siegmund|Sven Siegmund]] 22:34, 12 July 2007 (CEST) | I thought Glottopedia would contain articles somehow related to Linguistics. Basically every article would have to be in this category. I feel we still don't have a consens on the category levels in Glottopedia. There is this guideline ([[Glottopedia:Categorization]]), but there are [[:Category:Categories|These top-level categories]]. There is a lot to discuss. --[[User:Sven Siegmund|Sven Siegmund]] 22:34, 12 July 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I think the category "Linguistik" should be eliminated, and deleted from all the articles which contain it. It comes from WikiLingua, where some articles fall more in the area of computation. But in Glottopedia, all articles are relevant to linguistics, so a category "linguistics" would not make sense. Moreover, categories should be in English.--[[User:Haspelmath|Haspelmath]] 09:38, 13 July 2007 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:38, 13 July 2007
What is this category for?
I thought Glottopedia would contain articles somehow related to Linguistics. Basically every article would have to be in this category. I feel we still don't have a consens on the category levels in Glottopedia. There is this guideline (Glottopedia:Categorization), but there are These top-level categories. There is a lot to discuss. --Sven Siegmund 22:34, 12 July 2007 (CEST)
- I think the category "Linguistik" should be eliminated, and deleted from all the articles which contain it. It comes from WikiLingua, where some articles fall more in the area of computation. But in Glottopedia, all articles are relevant to linguistics, so a category "linguistics" would not make sense. Moreover, categories should be in English.--Haspelmath 09:38, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
