Difference between revisions of "ID-rule"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Marked as {{ref}}) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Comment=== | ===Comment=== | ||
| − | ID-rules were first introduced in [[ | + | ID-rules were first introduced in [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]]. Moder unification-based grammar formalisms like [[Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar]] use a small number of highly general ID schemata instead. |
Formally, the righthand side of an ID-rule can be considered as a [[multi-set|multi sets]]. | Formally, the righthand side of an ID-rule can be considered as a [[multi-set|multi sets]]. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Other Languages=== | ===Other Languages=== | ||
* German [[ID-Regel]] | * German [[ID-Regel]] | ||
| − | {{dc}} | + | {{dc}}{{ref}} |
[[Category: Grammatical theory]] | [[Category: Grammatical theory]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 3 July 2014
An ID-rule X <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>Y_1,</math> <math>Y_2,</math> ..., <math>Y_n </math> is interpreted as a well-formedness condition for local trees: It licenses all local trees with a root X and daughters <math>Y_1,</math> <math>Y_2,</math> ..., <math>Y_n </math>. The order of the daughters dominated by X is considered to be irrelevant.
See also
Comment
ID-rules were first introduced in Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Moder unification-based grammar formalisms like Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar use a small number of highly general ID schemata instead.
Formally, the righthand side of an ID-rule can be considered as a multi sets.
Other Languages
- German ID-Regel
| REF | This article has no reference(s) or source(s). Please remove this block only when the problem is solved. |
