Difference between revisions of "Speech-act participant"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (+cat) |
m (fix headings) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Speech-act participant''' (abbreviated SAP) refers to 1st or 2nd person to the exclusion of 3rd person. | '''Speech-act participant''' (abbreviated SAP) refers to 1st or 2nd person to the exclusion of 3rd person. | ||
− | == Example == | + | === Example === |
Certain subsystems of a language’s grammar are sensitive to speech-act participants. (They do not distinguish between 1st or 2nd person, but contrast them both with third person (non-speech-act participant).) | Certain subsystems of a language’s grammar are sensitive to speech-act participants. (They do not distinguish between 1st or 2nd person, but contrast them both with third person (non-speech-act participant).) | ||
− | In [[Sahaptin]], the [[ergative]] | + | In [[Sahaptin]], the [[ergative case]] appears on 3rd person nouns only if the object is a speech-act participant (Rude 1997): |
{| | {| | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
If the object is not a speech-act participant, the 3rd person noun may not be marked by ergative case: | If the object is not a speech-act participant, the 3rd person noun may not be marked by ergative case: | ||
Line 45: | Line 42: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | === Synonym === | ||
− | + | [[Local]] (e.g. Andrews 1985) | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | === References === | |
− | + | *Andrews, Avery. 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In ''Language Typology and syntactic description,'' vol. 1. ''Clause structure,'' ed. by Timothy Shopen, pp. 62–154 | |
− | Andrews, Avery. 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In ''Language Typology and syntactic description,'' vol. 1. ''Clause structure,'' ed. by Timothy Shopen, pp. 62–154 | + | *Rude, Noel. 1997. On the history of nominal case in Sahaptian. In ''International Journal of American Linguistics'', Vol. 63, No. 1. University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–143 |
− | + | ===Other languages=== | |
+ | German [[Sprechaktteilnehmer]] | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
+ | [[Category:General]] |
Latest revision as of 05:40, 1 April 2008
Speech-act participant (abbreviated SAP) refers to 1st or 2nd person to the exclusion of 3rd person.
Example
Certain subsystems of a language’s grammar are sensitive to speech-act participants. (They do not distinguish between 1st or 2nd person, but contrast them both with third person (non-speech-act participant).)
In Sahaptin, the ergative case appears on 3rd person nouns only if the object is a speech-act participant (Rude 1997):
ɨwínš-nɨm=naš | i-q̓ínun-a |
man-ERG=1SG | 3nom-see-PST |
The man saw me. |
ɨwínš-nɨm=am | i-q̓ínun-a |
man-ERG=2SG | 3nom-see-PST |
The man saw you. |
If the object is not a speech-act participant, the 3rd person noun may not be marked by ergative case:
ɨwínš | i-q̓ínun-a | miyánaš-na |
man | 3nom-see-PST | child-ACC |
The man saw the child. | ||
(*ɨwínš-nɨm i-q̓ínun-a miyánaš-na) |
Synonym
Local (e.g. Andrews 1985)
References
- Andrews, Avery. 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Language Typology and syntactic description, vol. 1. Clause structure, ed. by Timothy Shopen, pp. 62–154
- Rude, Noel. 1997. On the history of nominal case in Sahaptian. In International Journal of American Linguistics, Vol. 63, No. 1. University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–143
Other languages
German Sprechaktteilnehmer