Difference between revisions of "Complementary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: '''Complementary''' is a characteristic of pairs of lexical items that the denial of the one implies the assertion of the other and the assertion of the one implies the denial of the other...) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Complementary''' is a | + | '''Complementary''' is a [[sense relation]] holding between any pair of predicates <''P'', ''Q''> that fulfills the following conditions: If a referent ''x'' has property ''P'', it cannot have property ''Q'', and if ''x'' does not have property ''P'', it has property ''Q'': |
| + | |||
| + | :P → not Q<br>not P → Q | ||
| + | |||
| + | Complementarity is a special case of [[incompatibility]]. | ||
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 9: | ||
===Other languages=== | ===Other languages=== | ||
| − | + | Chinese [[互补性]] <br> | |
| + | German [[Komplementarität]] <br> | ||
| − | === | + | ===References=== |
| − | {{: Lyons 1968}} | + | * {{: Lyons 1968}} |
| + | * Cruse, A. 2004. ''Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Semantics]] | [[Category:Semantics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:56, 22 June 2014
Complementary is a sense relation holding between any pair of predicates <P, Q> that fulfills the following conditions: If a referent x has property P, it cannot have property Q, and if x does not have property P, it has property Q:
- P → not Q
not P → Q
Complementarity is a special case of incompatibility.
Examples
single: married, male: female
Other languages
Chinese 互补性
German Komplementarität
References
- Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cruse, A. 2004. Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
