Difference between revisions of "Inflection"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) (utrecht) |
m (fixed spelling, added a sentence clarifying what kinds of grammatical information inflectional morphemes typically encode, added a 'see also' section with links to agreement and concord.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Inflection''' is a one of the main types of morphological operations by which an affix is added to a word. An inflectional affix adds a particular grammatical function to a word without changing the category of that word, or even leading to a different word. We may say that inflected forms are just variants of one and the same word. | + | '''Inflection''' is a one of the main types of morphological operations by which an [[affix]] is added to a word. An inflectional affix adds a particular grammatical function to a word without changing the category of that word, or even leading to a different word. We may say that inflected forms are just variants of one and the same word. Some examples of grammatical information that can be encoded by inflectional morphemes include [[Phi-features]] (e.g. [[person]], [[number]], [[gender]], [[case]]), [[mood]], [[tense]], and [[aspect]]. |
| − | === | + | ===Term properties=== |
| + | The relational adjective is ''inflectional''. An alternative spelling (confined to British English and increasingly outdated) is ''inflexion''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Examples === | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Count noun]]s in English can be pluralized by adding the inflectional ending -''s'' (''dog-dogs'', ''noun-nouns''). The plural forms ''dogs'' and ''nouns'' are variants of the base nouns ''dog'' and ''noun''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Comments=== | ||
| + | Traditionally inflection is distinguished from [[derivation]] (the second type of major morphological operation). Although it is not possible to draw a sharp boundary between both types of operation, there are at least two differences: (i) inflection is never category-changing, while derivation often category changing, and (ii) inflection is usually peripheral to derivation. Some linguists (e.g. Aronoff (1976), Anderson (1982), Perlmutter (1988)) assume that inflection and derivation belong to different components of the grammar. This view is not uncontroversial though, since others (e.g. Halle (1973), Kiparsky (1982)) assume that inflection and derivation are reflexes of one and the same operation, namely affixation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===See also=== | ||
| + | *[[agreement]]<br> | ||
| + | *[[concord]] <br> | ||
| − | |||
=== Link === | === Link === | ||
| Line 16: | Line 27: | ||
* Chomsky, N. 1955. ''The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory,'' University of Chicago Press, Chicago(1975). | * Chomsky, N. 1955. ''The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory,'' University of Chicago Press, Chicago(1975). | ||
* Halle, M. 1973. ''Prolegomena to a Theory of Word-Formation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 4, pp. 451-464 | * Halle, M. 1973. ''Prolegomena to a Theory of Word-Formation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 4, pp. 451-464 | ||
| + | * Haspelmath, M. and A. Sims. 2010. "Chapter 5: Inflection and Derivation" in ''Understanding Mophology'' Second edition. Routledge. | ||
* Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175 | * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175 | ||
* Perlmutter, D. 1988. ''The Split-morphology Hypothesis: evidence from Yiddish,'' in: Hammond, M. and M. Noonan (eds.) Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Orlando, Academic Press. | * Perlmutter, D. 1988. ''The Split-morphology Hypothesis: evidence from Yiddish,'' in: Hammond, M. and M. Noonan (eds.) Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Orlando, Academic Press. | ||
| − | * Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. ''Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP,'' Linguistic Inquiry 20, pp.365-424 | + | * Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. ''Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP,'' Linguistic Inquiry 20, pp.365-424. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Other languages=== | |
| + | German [[Flexion]] | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Morphology]] | [[Category:Morphology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:53, 8 February 2021
Inflection is a one of the main types of morphological operations by which an affix is added to a word. An inflectional affix adds a particular grammatical function to a word without changing the category of that word, or even leading to a different word. We may say that inflected forms are just variants of one and the same word. Some examples of grammatical information that can be encoded by inflectional morphemes include Phi-features (e.g. person, number, gender, case), mood, tense, and aspect.
Term properties
The relational adjective is inflectional. An alternative spelling (confined to British English and increasingly outdated) is inflexion.
Examples
Count nouns in English can be pluralized by adding the inflectional ending -s (dog-dogs, noun-nouns). The plural forms dogs and nouns are variants of the base nouns dog and noun.
Comments
Traditionally inflection is distinguished from derivation (the second type of major morphological operation). Although it is not possible to draw a sharp boundary between both types of operation, there are at least two differences: (i) inflection is never category-changing, while derivation often category changing, and (ii) inflection is usually peripheral to derivation. Some linguists (e.g. Aronoff (1976), Anderson (1982), Perlmutter (1988)) assume that inflection and derivation belong to different components of the grammar. This view is not uncontroversial though, since others (e.g. Halle (1973), Kiparsky (1982)) assume that inflection and derivation are reflexes of one and the same operation, namely affixation.
See also
Link
Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
References
- Anderson, S.R. 1982. Where's Morphology?, Linguistic Inquiry 13, pp. 571-612, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Aronoff, M. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Chomsky, N. 1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory, MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 1-67. Reprinted in: Chomsky (1995).
- Chomsky, N. 1955. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago(1975).
- Halle, M. 1973. Prolegomena to a Theory of Word-Formation, Linguistic Inquiry 4, pp. 451-464
- Haspelmath, M. and A. Sims. 2010. "Chapter 5: Inflection and Derivation" in Understanding Mophology Second edition. Routledge.
- Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology, in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175
- Perlmutter, D. 1988. The Split-morphology Hypothesis: evidence from Yiddish, in: Hammond, M. and M. Noonan (eds.) Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Orlando, Academic Press.
- Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP, Linguistic Inquiry 20, pp.365-424.
Other languages
German Flexion
