Difference between revisions of "Strict Cyclicity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m |
(Removed the block {{format}}) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Definition== | ||
'''Strict Cyclicity''' is a rule that may apply to a string x just in case either of the following holds: | '''Strict Cyclicity''' is a rule that may apply to a string x just in case either of the following holds: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
previous cycle but crucially refers to information | previous cycle but crucially refers to information | ||
supplied by a rule operating on the current cycle. | supplied by a rule operating on the current cycle. | ||
| − | (formulation of | + | (formulation of Kenstowicz (1994)) |
From this condition on the application of cyclic rules important theoretical consequences have been drawn. It follows form this condition that cyclic rules cannot operate on underived lexical items. | From this condition on the application of cyclic rules important theoretical consequences have been drawn. It follows form this condition that cyclic rules cannot operate on underived lexical items. | ||
| − | + | == Example == | |
| + | In English the rule Trisyllabic shortening shortens the underlying vowel of ''sane'' [e] to [æ] in the derived word ''san-ity''. This rule does not apply in the underived item ''nightingale''. | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
| − | + | *[http://wwwsubst:2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strict+Cyclicity&lemmacode=267 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [http://wwwsubst:2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strict+Cyclicity&lemmacode=267 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == References == | ||
* Halle, M. 1978. ''Formal versus Functional Considerations in Phonology,'' Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club. | * Halle, M. 1978. ''Formal versus Functional Considerations in Phonology,'' Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club. | ||
* Kiparsky, P. 1985. ''Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations, vol 1, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 131-175 | * Kiparsky, P. 1985. ''Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations, vol 1, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 131-175 | ||
| Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
| − | {{stub}}{{cats | + | {{stub}}{{cats}} |
Latest revision as of 08:50, 10 August 2014
Definition
Strict Cyclicity is a rule that may apply to a string x just in case either of the following holds:
a. The rule makes crucial reference to information in the
representation that spans the boundary between the
current cycle and the preceding one.
b. The rule applies solely within the domain of the
previous cycle but crucially refers to information
supplied by a rule operating on the current cycle.
(formulation of Kenstowicz (1994))
From this condition on the application of cyclic rules important theoretical consequences have been drawn. It follows form this condition that cyclic rules cannot operate on underived lexical items.
Example
In English the rule Trisyllabic shortening shortens the underlying vowel of sane [e] to [æ] in the derived word san-ity. This rule does not apply in the underived item nightingale.
Links
References
- Halle, M. 1978. Formal versus Functional Considerations in Phonology, Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
- Kiparsky, P. 1985. Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology, in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations, vol 1, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 131-175
- Mascará, J. 1976. Catalan Phonology and the Phonological Cycle, PhD dissertation MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Distr. by IULC, Bloomington Indiana,1978.
| STUB |
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
