Difference between revisions of "User:Andynsaffa/Conceptual Metaphors"
Andynsaffa (talk | contribs) (I added some text in this entry by citing a book titled "Metaphors we Live By" by Lakoff and Johnson.) |
Andynsaffa (talk | contribs) (I added more explanation in this entry) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, Metaphors We Live By. The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source). For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments: | + | Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, Metaphors We Live By. The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source). |
| + | |||
| + | For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments: | ||
"He ''attacked'' my point." | "He ''attacked'' my point." | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
"She ''won'' the argument." | "She ''won'' the argument." | ||
| − | In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). | + | In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this. |
''This article is still on progress | ''This article is still on progress | ||
'' | '' | ||
Revision as of 05:30, 16 May 2024
Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, Metaphors We Live By. The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments:
"He attacked my point."
"I defended my position."
"She won the argument."
In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we do in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this.
This article is still on progress
