Difference between revisions of "Impersonal construction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | An '''impersonal construction''' is a clausal construction in which no [[subject]] is realized. | + | An '''impersonal construction''' is a clausal construction in which no [[subject]] is realized, or at least no referential subject. |
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | ''Dancing is going on.'' | + | ''Dancing is going on.'' ([[impersonal passive]]) |
{| | {| | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | ''One wears white this summer.'' | + | ''One wears white this summer.'' (construction with [[impersonal pronoun]] in subject position) |
[[Japanese]] does not require an overt/dummy subject, as is demonstrated in this example: | [[Japanese]] does not require an overt/dummy subject, as is demonstrated in this example: | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:::*''"Whereas passivization detransitivizes a verb by deleting its logical subject, impersonalization preserves transitivity, and merely inhibits the syntactic realization of a surface subject."'' (Blevins 2003). | :::*''"Whereas passivization detransitivizes a verb by deleting its logical subject, impersonalization preserves transitivity, and merely inhibits the syntactic realization of a surface subject."'' (Blevins 2003). | ||
| − | The non-realized subjects of impersonals are often interpreted as indefinite human agents, thus those constructions are often only possible with verbs which select a human agent. In languages which require an overt subject (i.e. languages not allowing [[pro-drop]]) | + | The non-realized subjects of impersonals are often interpreted as indefinite human agents, thus those constructions are often only possible with verbs which select a human agent. In languages which require an overt subject (i.e. languages not allowing [[pro-drop]]) an [[expletive subject]] is used. |
| + | |||
| + | Other constructions that have been called "impersonal" are: | ||
| + | *constructions with an [[expletive subject]] (e.g. ''it is raining'', Russian ''svetaet'' 'it dawns') | ||
| + | *"subjectless" experiential constructions with the experiencer in a non-nominative case (e.g. Latin ''me pudet'' 'I am ashamed', German ''mich friert'' 'I am cold') | ||
===Synonym=== | ===Synonym=== | ||
| − | * | + | *[[subjectless construction]] |
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
*Blevins, James P. 2003. Passives and Impersonals. ''Journal of Linguistics'' 39: 473-520. | *Blevins, James P. 2003. Passives and Impersonals. ''Journal of Linguistics'' 39: 473-520. | ||
| + | *Lambert, P.-Y. 1998. L’impersonnel. In J. Feuillet (ed.). ''Actance et valence dans les Langues de l’Europe.'' Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 295-347. | ||
*Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 2006. ''Agency and Impersonality. Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestation.'' Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. | *Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 2006. ''Agency and Impersonality. Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestation.'' Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Other languages=== | ||
| + | French [[construction impersonnelle]] German [[unpersönliche Konstruktion]] | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
Revision as of 13:43, 8 January 2008
An impersonal construction is a clausal construction in which no subject is realized, or at least no referential subject.
Examples
The following examples are impersonal constructions from German:
| Es | wird | getanzt. |
| EXPLETIVE | AUX | dance.PARTICIPLE |
Dancing is going on. (impersonal passive)
| Man | trägt | diesen | Sommer | weiß. |
| one | wear.3SG | this | summer | white |
One wears white this summer. (construction with impersonal pronoun in subject position)
Japanese does not require an overt/dummy subject, as is demonstrated in this example:
| Nichiyobi | heiten | |
| sunday | close.shop |
We are closed on Sundays. (cited after Yamamoto 2006: 4)
Comments
In the recent linguistic literature, a clear distinction has been made between passives and impersonal constructions (cf. Blevins 2003, Yamamoto 2006).
- "Whereas passivization detransitivizes a verb by deleting its logical subject, impersonalization preserves transitivity, and merely inhibits the syntactic realization of a surface subject." (Blevins 2003).
The non-realized subjects of impersonals are often interpreted as indefinite human agents, thus those constructions are often only possible with verbs which select a human agent. In languages which require an overt subject (i.e. languages not allowing pro-drop) an expletive subject is used.
Other constructions that have been called "impersonal" are:
- constructions with an expletive subject (e.g. it is raining, Russian svetaet 'it dawns')
- "subjectless" experiential constructions with the experiencer in a non-nominative case (e.g. Latin me pudet 'I am ashamed', German mich friert 'I am cold')
Synonym
References
- Blevins, James P. 2003. Passives and Impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 39: 473-520.
- Lambert, P.-Y. 1998. L’impersonnel. In J. Feuillet (ed.). Actance et valence dans les Langues de l’Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 295-347.
- Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 2006. Agency and Impersonality. Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Other languages
French construction impersonnelle German unpersönliche Konstruktion
