Difference between revisions of "Template talk:InfoboxLanguage"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m |
(update) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Should I include these into to template? --[[User:MRiessler|MRiessler]] ([[User talk:MRiessler|talk]]) 10:37, 1 February 2013 (CET) | Should I include these into to template? --[[User:MRiessler|MRiessler]] ([[User talk:MRiessler|talk]]) 10:37, 1 February 2013 (CET) | ||
+ | : Good idea. Feel free to do so. IMHO it'd be more appropriate to call the category [[Writing system]], however. --[[User:Wohlgemuth|wohlgemuth]] ([[User talk:Wohlgemuth|talk]]) 13:38, 1 February 2013 (CET) | ||
− | : | + | :: I will work further on it and merge the present template completely with [[:Template:InfoboxLanguageNew]]. I will later also check the pages using this template already. In the article on [[Kildin Saami]] it looks ok. But what is *[[MPIExt]]? It is not used any longer. --[[User:MRiessler|MRiessler]] ([[User talk:MRiessler|talk]]) 17:48, 2 February 2013 (CET) |
Revision as of 16:48, 2 February 2013
What about adding a category
- Orthography, with the values e.g. Latin (script), Cyrillic, Devanagari etc.
and a section on links and resources, like
- links to Wikipedia pages on the language
- OLAC resources
- and the like
Should I include these into to template? --MRiessler (talk) 10:37, 1 February 2013 (CET)
- Good idea. Feel free to do so. IMHO it'd be more appropriate to call the category Writing system, however. --wohlgemuth (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2013 (CET)
- I will work further on it and merge the present template completely with Template:InfoboxLanguageNew. I will later also check the pages using this template already. In the article on Kildin Saami it looks ok. But what is *MPIExt? It is not used any longer. --MRiessler (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2013 (CET)