Difference between revisions of "Line (in relational network theory)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (removed a red link) |
(repaired a link) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=== Sources === | === Sources === | ||
− | *[[Sydney M. Lamb|Lamb, Sydney M.]]. 2004. '' [ | + | *[[Sydney M. Lamb|Lamb, Sydney M.]]. 2004. '' [https://books.google.com/books/about/Language_and_Reality.html?id=vrlPUxB2_JwC Language and Reality: Selected Writings of Sydney Lamb].'' London: Continuum. |
*[http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~lngbrain LangBrain] | *[http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~lngbrain LangBrain] | ||
Revision as of 22:32, 28 February 2017
In the notations used by relational network theory, a line connects nodes. Lines often have labels next to them in order to make network diagrams easier to read; the labels are not part of the structure.
Connections differ in strength. A line of a given strength may carry varying degrees of activation. It is not the case that you just have a line connecting two points to indicate an interrelationship or else you don't. You can have lines of varying degrees of strength, from a slight, tenuous connection to a strong one. Like a pathway going through a field or a jungle, the more it gets used, the easier it is to use the next time.
In Compact vs. Narrow Notation
- All lines in expanded or narrow notation are one-way lines.
- Lines of compact notation are bidirectional; they are like lines on a highway map for divided highways -- really a pair of oppositely directed lines but drawn as one, just to keep the map from being too cluttered.
Sources
- Lamb, Sydney M.. 2004. Language and Reality: Selected Writings of Sydney Lamb. London: Continuum.
- LangBrain