Difference between revisions of "Logophoricity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (utrecht) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Logophoricity''' is a phenomenon of coreferentiality that is not covered by the [[Binding theory]]. Compare (i) and (ii): | + | '''Logophoricity''' is a phenomenon of coreferentiality that is not covered by the classical Chomskyan [[Binding theory]]. Compare (i) and (ii): |
(i) * Bill<sub>i</sub> told us that Elisabeth had invited himself<sub>i</sub> | (i) * Bill<sub>i</sub> told us that Elisabeth had invited himself<sub>i</sub> | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In (i) ''himself'' cannot be bound by ''Bill'' (due to [[Condition A]] of the Binding theory). But in (ii) ''himself'' can be coreferential with ''Bill'' in (apparent) violation of Condition A. The co-referentiality of (ii) is considered one of logophoricity. | In (i) ''himself'' cannot be bound by ''Bill'' (due to [[Condition A]] of the Binding theory). But in (ii) ''himself'' can be coreferential with ''Bill'' in (apparent) violation of Condition A. The co-referentiality of (ii) is considered one of logophoricity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Origin=== | ||
| + | The notion arose in the 1990s in discussions of English ''himself''. it was inspired by the phenomenon of [[logophoric pronoun]]s, which were first described for African languages. | ||
=== Link === | === Link === | ||
| Line 12: | Line 15: | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Anaphora]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:17, 17 February 2009
Logophoricity is a phenomenon of coreferentiality that is not covered by the classical Chomskyan Binding theory. Compare (i) and (ii):
(i) * Billi told us that Elisabeth had invited himselfi (ii) Billi told us that Elisabeth had invited Charles and himselfi
In (i) himself cannot be bound by Bill (due to Condition A of the Binding theory). But in (ii) himself can be coreferential with Bill in (apparent) violation of Condition A. The co-referentiality of (ii) is considered one of logophoricity.
Origin
The notion arose in the 1990s in discussions of English himself. it was inspired by the phenomenon of logophoric pronouns, which were first described for African languages.
